Archive for the ‘Subdivision’ Category

Update (and Powerlines!) - November 2009

Thursday, November 19th, 2009

 

Just some quick info:

  • No news from Summerhill about the vibration survey
  • No reply from CN Rail about some of the track changes people have mentioned might be coming (see previous posts)
  • Train seemed super busy the last few weeks, noticed a lot more shaking after a considerable period of ‘quiet’. Trains seemed to carrying heavier/taller roads (i.e., riding well above the fence height)
  • As mentioned previously we have stopped phoning to complain… don’t know if that is or isn’t having any impact
  • The trails through the subdivision are mostly finished, our family has been making extensive use of them… hope to see more families out and about next spring/summer

Powerlines

As many of you know (and have probably received the flyers for), there is a possiblity that large-scale powerlines will be built relatively near the Tamarack subdivision. I urge you to come out to the meeting on November 24/09 to voice your concerns — there is a chance that they might be convinced to bury the lines instead.

Details can be found at www.reta.ca

Thanks Dundee

Thursday, October 22nd, 2009

After we moved into our house (a corner lot) we contacted Dundee in regards to whether they were going to be building a fence on our lot (many corner lots in subdivisions get fences supplied by the developer). At the time they said no and so we built our own.

This summer we noticed that Dundee was putting in fences on all the corner lots and we contacted them again. And not only did they come out and paint our fence (which we hadn’t done yet) they also reimbursed us for the cost of the section of fence they would’ve put up for us!

That was a pleasant surprise for us, so thanks Dundee.

Developers are still ‘bending’ the truth

Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009

So the latest I’m hearing from people who have e-mailed is that sales people for Summerhill, Lincolnberg, Avi, et cetera are still misleading potential buyers.

They are telling them that disturbance from the train is minimal. They have also mentioned that the developer Dundee has a deal with CN Rail where the whistling might stop because they’ve made a deal to subsidize a new control arm. I hope that’s true but I’m doubtful. I’ll do some doublechecking. If anyone actually contacts CN and finds out if this is true let me know.

Update

Friday, June 19th, 2009

It seems the trains are getting busy again, counted four very noisy ones this morning already!

In regards to the subdivision I am waiting on a reply in regards to the cost for doing another ground vibration survey. I’ll let everyone know once I know the details.

If any of you have the time there is a bit of a picnic in the subdivision (to get more homebuyers), might be worthwhile mentioning to potential new residents the effects of the trains on our lives. I’ll be posting some flyers, hopefully the salespeople for Lincolnberg, Summerhill, and such don’t tear them down right away. I noticed the Tamarack entry in the wikipedia keeps on getting the reference to the CN Rail train line removed.

In better news I took a nice bike ride behind the train tracks, near the marsh. Here’s a photo:

img_17111

Additionally, some more reference links:
 
Whistle Cessation Guideline:
http://www.tc.gc.ca/RailSafety/Guideline/EliminatingWhistling.htm
 
Train Whistle requirements (CROR rule 14):
http://www.tc.gc.ca/RailSafety/Rules/TCO093/signals.htm
 
Rules for Track Maintenance
http://www.tc.gc.ca/RailSafety/Rules/TCE31.htm (the railway determines the speed they need to operate at (called class of track) and the rules specify the maintenance standards for that class of track.
 
For your information, your house is located at approximately mile 7.0 of the CN Camrose Subdivision and the maximum speed currently allowable on that piece of track is 40 mph (70 kpm).  As discussed, many of the trains may be operating at speeds significantly lower than the maximum which may lead to the impression that some of the trains are speeding.
 
Transport Canada has ongoing programs to regularly monitor train speeds and track maintenance and holds the railway accountable for compliance to the requirements.
 

Tamarack - The Other Side of the Tracks

Monday, May 11th, 2009

After many discussions with Transport Canada, Summerhill, CN Rail and the like, it really seems the City of Edmonton made a huge mistake developing so close to the tracks — a mistake shared of course by Dundee, the subdivision developer.

We might not be able to do anything about the trains, but we might be able to influence how the other half of the subdivision is developed. I’m not sure how to go about this, but I definitely think that side of the tracks should be placed further away from the train line. Maybe more flyers would help — though I’ve noticed that the showhomes people are driving around and pulling them down. We’ve put one ad in a newspaper, we might do that again.

Any other thoughts? I really don’t want our future neighbors on the other side of the tracks to have to put up with shaking houses and cracking foundations like we are.

Tamarack - Summerhill update

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

(Back to main page)

We have received a reply from Michael Haupt the General Manager for Summerhill Homes, in regards to our being disatisfied with how the sale process went for our home in the Tamarack subdivision of Edmonton, Alberta, and how difficult it had been to gather information to make a more informed decision.

This is a high-level summary of his response:

  • A ground vibration study was performed for Dundee (the area developer) on May 23 to June 2 2003 and established that “the ground-bourne vibration level at the building location is expected to fall well below the Reiher and Meister limit of ‘barely noticeable to persons’…
  • On page 2 it is shown that Dundee decided to ignore the CN recommendation for maximum ground vibration and build closer to the tracks than they needed to. “…the ground vibration level at the 45m setback will be approximately 0.16mm/sec slightly exceeding the CN criteria of 0.14 mm/sec.
  • Certain statements in the study such as  on page 3 where it says “As can be seen from Figure 3, the anticipated vibration level at the 45m setback location will be still substantially lower than that caused by bus traffic in front of the house” contradict with our actual experience. We suffer significantly more disturbance than when we lived in a home on a bus route.

Even more concerning is that the construction that is occurring across the alley from us (new homes being dug and built) is causing less vibration and noise than the train.

You can download/read the full cn-rail-line-assessment-tamarack here.

However Mr. Haupt did offer a propsoal. Summerhill Homes is willing to form a committe to review the vibration noise and have another vibration survey performed to see if there have been any changes in rail operation (the last survey was 6 years ago)  and if they are affecting homes.

Summerhill and interested homeowners would share the workload and cost. If you are interested in participating in this please e-mail Brent at knowedge@hotmail.com

That said, even if there are problems found, we would still need to try and work with CN Rail to do something about changing the way the rail line works and based on my discussions with Transport Canada and CN, this is very unlikely. This is one of their most important rail lines.

We haven’t decided exactly what we are going to do. All parties, including the homeowners, share some of the blame but I can’t help but feel that the City of Edmonton and Dundee are the biggest culprits here. There was no need with such a large land mass available to build right beside the tracks.

Anways, if you are interested in working with Summerhill to do another vibration study please let me know.

The second attachment a Lot plan

Mr. Haupt also included a tamarack-area-map.

The date on the second PDF is interesting. September 2007. I suspect many homeowners had already started the construction process. (Sorry for this document being upside down, that’s how it arrived to us).

Additionally, unless I’m missing it, I can’t find a scale on this map to determine how far away the houses are from the line. This just goes to show how difficult it was to find any real information when we were making our initial decision to build our home in Tamarack. The maps we received during our consideration period are even less detailed than this one.

Sign the Petition!

Thursday, April 23rd, 2009

Please sign the petitition to reduce train noise in Tamarack and neighboring subdivisions. Link on the sidebar to the right or click here.

Expect the Train to get busier

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009

I’ve been doing some more research and it appears that expansion of the port at Prince Rupert will likely result in increased train traffic as more goods are hauled along the CN Rail line. From the wikipedia entry:

On September 12, 2007, phase 1 the Fairview Terminal opened for business and is expecting its first container ship (from COSCO) in October. Phase 1 has an annual container-handling capacity of only 500,000 TEUs.[4] However Phase 2, due to be completed late in 2010, will increase the Port of Prince Rupert’s capacity to 2 million TEUs, and to 4 million TEUs by 2015, and there is extensive capacity for further expansion

City of Edmonton and Tamarack

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009

This pdf available here is the City of Edmonton’s plan for the Tamarack subdivision. I would have expected more discussion of the train line then this:

4.3.8 Private Railway Corporation Right-of-Way

Ensure future development adheres to the guidelines established by Canadian

National Railway (CNR) and Transportation Canada regarding the provision of

separation spaces, fences, berms and buffers.

The Tamarack NSP shall ensure appropriate measures are undertaken to address

the transition between land uses and the private railway corporations’ secondary line.

Such measures may include the consideration of landscaping, berming, sound

attenuation/screen fencing, site design and building orientation. The City of

Edmonton’s Urban Traffic Noise Policy will be followed and noise attenuation will be

provided where required.

This is what Dundee says about Tamarack

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009

The following is a sitemap posted in the Tamarack subdivision.

The train line is not shown.

img_5985